“I’m a civil rights attorney. I’m a victim rights attorney”. Gloria Allred
I want to begin the ‘right’ to counsel with for hire mercenary Tim ‘Pretend-to-Defend’ Haney…
Amanda hired Timothy Haney privately with a $3000 retainer fee, but I cannot speak to if or what Amanda has paid Tim since the ‘deposit’ required for what should have been the down payment for Tim to begin defending Amanda’s ‘rights’. Instead it was the down payment that ensured Mr. Haney could actively coordinate/participate the complete and total ‘rights’ deprivation of her mother’s, and thus deprivation the ‘rights’ to the parent-child relationship of Audrie Elizabeth Sargent herself. 😦
As biological and custodial parents we still have ‘parental rights’ left? RIGHT???
I THINK WHEN AMANDA HIRED TIMOTHY HANEY TO DEFEND HER ‘RIGHTS’ IN BOTH HER DIVORCE HEARING IN ANOTHER COURT IN THE INTEREST OF AUDRIE’S LITTLE SISTER, AND DEFEND HER PARENT-CHILD RELATIONSHIP ‘RIGHT’ IN THIS COURT AGAINST TERMINATION BY DFPS IT WAS THE FINAL MOMENT THAT ENSURED EACH OF US HAD MANAGED TO RETAIN A NEPOTISTIC COMPLICIT, AND REALLY MORE PARTICIPATORY PLAYER AGAINST US IN THIS SICK GAME TO DEPRIVE US OF ALL RIGHTS FOR MONEY AND BECAUSE OUR EMOTIONAL REACTIONS MAKE IT PERSONAL TO THE ‘AUTHORITIES’ OUT TO SUPPRESS OR COVER-UP THEIR DOINGS FOR FEAR OF BEING EXPOSED FOR THEIR DEEPEST OF UNETHICAL ACTIONS AND MORALLY REPRESSIBLE BEHAVIORS .
Not only has Timothy Haney failed to present a single legal defense on Amanda’s behalf in this CPS suit, I should mention that he lost the other case of Amanda;s which was a divorce case not since finalized. So he lost her primary caretaker from Bella, and also Separated Bella, Audrie and her mother when he lost custody hearings from Bella’s parents divorce so by default Audrie lost her loving younger sibling to the very person who terrorized her life for years until he made the anonymous CPS call now the only reason she has been kept from her family for over the legal amount of time the courts and CPS had.
I was served with a lawsuit on October 19th, 2017 by DFPS attempting to strip me of the ‘right’ to parent before It was even implied my parenting job was not being done right.
But we still have some ‘right’ don’t we? Surely we do right??
Notice we have the ‘right’ to either:
1) Hire an expert of our choosing to defend our ‘rights’ at whatever financial cost we can or cannot afford.
2) Rely on a Court of Justice (or the Justice/Judges themselves) to choose who defends our ‘rights’ at whatever the standard financial cost happens to be.
Audrie’s mother Amanda, as a financial beneficiary of my monetary support of Audrie, choose to privately hire a Grayson County, Texas attorney to defend her ‘rights’ as a parent. She choose Timothy Haney to defend her ‘parental rights’
Myself, as Audrie’s father and the financial contributor of the monetary support to her mother had no choice but to ask the 397th Judicial District Court of Grayson County, Texas to decide who would be assigned to the defense of my ‘rights’ as a parent. The Presiding Judge of the 397th, the Honorable Judge Brian Gary, choose the attorney ad litem of parent Beverly Rogers to defend my ‘parental rights’ by accepting my affidavit of indigency to not be able to afford the monetary cost of private representation.